Bold Reforms Needed for Business Tax System – Leading Tax Experts

Posted on June 1, 2016 in Debates


May 31, 2016 – The Canadian corporate income tax system has a number of problems that call for fundamental reforms, starting with rethinking the main role of the system, according to a report from the C.D. Howe Institute. In “Modernizing Business Taxation”, authors Robin Boadway and Jean-François Tremblay put forward bold recommendations to increase the efficiency and fairness of corporate taxation in Canada.

“The corporate tax is designed to prevent shareholders from sheltering income from the personal income tax,” commented Boadway. “The problem is most capital income can be sheltered and therefore the system is not meeting its intended goal.” Tremblay added: “The current system also places most of the tax burden on labour and distorts firms’ investment decisions, financing decisions, risk-taking and innovation efforts. The system desperately needs reform.”

The authors recommend changing the tax base from shareholder income to above-normal profits, or revenues above the normal costs of doing business. More specifically, they urge the government to make the following, relatively straightforward changes:

  1. Adopt the allowance for corporate equity (ACE) tax system, which allows firms to deduct from taxable income the cost of equity financing, in addition to deducting interests on debt;
  2. Apply this tax base to both incorporated and unincorporated businesses;
  3. Eliminate the dividend-tax credit and the partial tax-exemption of capital gains to ensure the change is revenue neutral;
  4. Use the territorial approach for taxing international active business income;
  5. Allow firms to carry forward and backward tax losses at the risk-free interest rate, which would encourage risk-taking and innovation;
  6. Maintain the small business deduction to compensate for the non-refundability of losses, which are more prevalent among small businesses; and
  7. To promote innovation, consider introducing a preferential tax rate for patent income, as well as extending flow-through share financing to investment in small innovative firms.

The authors conclude: “These modern proposals address some of the most important concerns arising from a corporate tax system that was designed for a bygone era.”

View Full Report (

< >

Tags: , , , , ,

This entry was posted on Wednesday, June 1st, 2016 at 11:12 pm and is filed under Debates. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply