McGuinty must fixsignature program [child care]

Posted on February 14, 2011 in Child & Family Debates

Source: — Authors:

TheStar.com – opinion/editorials
Published On Mon Feb 14 2011.

When Premier Dalton McGuinty committed to full-day kindergarten for 4- and 5-year-olds he said it would do three things: “Help our kids succeed in schools down the road; save families time and money; and free up thousands of licensed child-care spaces.”

Already, 35,000 children are benefiting from his kindergarten pledge. This September, another 15,000 will join them. So far, so good.

But McGuinty has acted only on that part of his plan and left aside the rest of what was supposed to be a much broader push to meet all the needs of young children and their families. As a result, he has fallen short on his two other objectives: easing the burden for parents and opening up much-needed child-care spaces.

As the Star’s Laurie Monsebraaten reported in the Child-Care Challenge series on Saturday, parent fees are rising and some daycares may close. That leaves parents with fewer options than ever.

The original plan put forward by Charles Pascal, Ontario’s early learning adviser, would have ended the patchwork of programs and created a seamless education and child-care system.

But without that integration, we are seeing the chronically underfunded child-care system crumble from the loss of 4- and 5-year-olds. Their fees have always subsidized younger children.

The government should get back on track with the original vision before the child-care crisis gets even worse as full-day kindergarten is expanded to all schools by 2015.

Many parents are already at their wit’s end. They put their names on daycare waiting lists before their children are born. Those lucky enough to get a regulated space routinely pay $60 a day for it. It’s no surprise that waiting lists for subsidized spaces keep growing.

So far, Education Minister Leona Dombrowsky’s only answer to all this is to point to the substantial investments in child care the government has made in previous budgets, and its plans to open up before- and after-school care in schools to third-party providers. Neither fixes today’s problems.

And what will the future bring? Full-day kindergarten — combined with inadequate child care — will be implemented for only 20 per cent of Ontario’s 4- and 5-year-olds by the provincial election that will be held in October. With the present system underfunded and the future up in the air, it’s likely to turn into a political football.

Already, Progressive Conservative Leader Tim Hudak has likened the plan to a “shiny new car” that Ontarians can’t afford.

The last thing weary parents need is more turmoil and another change in course. Full-day kindergarten and affordable child care are vital for our youngest students and their families.

There are welcome indications that the Liberals and NDP in Ottawa will make a child-care plan a federal election issue. A national plan and funding are certainly needed. But McGuinty can’t wait.

He has his own election to fight and he is fast running out of time to fix, and therefore protect, one of his signature programs.

< http://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorials/article/938112–mcguinty-must-fixsignature-program >

Tags: , , , ,

This entry was posted on Monday, February 14th, 2011 at 12:28 pm and is filed under Child & Family Debates. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

One Response to “McGuinty must fixsignature program [child care]”

  1. Arsen says:

    While McGuinty is by far the worst Premier (the exploding debt and nvagtiee credit watch has the potential to drag all of Canada down after it), I would have to say Alison Redfern, Alberta is number two for the way she is squandering the positive legacy of Alberta’s social and economic performance as a conservative province. Without Alberta to pay the bills , it will be even harder to recover from McGuinty capsizing the Ontario economy and crippling the rest of Confederation.

|

Leave a Reply